Buongiorno,
ho trovato questo articolo, sull'ordine della presentazione nella testimonianza.
non è un argomento su cui abbiamo lavorato molto, ma può essere interessante
Qualcuno vuole dargli un'occhiata?
file:///C:/Users/Acer/Desktop/Corso%202017/ordine%20nella%20testimonianza.pdf
Summary: Legal decision-making studies often demonstrate context effects: People’s initial beliefs about a suspect’s guilt influence
their evaluation of subsequent evidence. We examine three potential moderators of these context effects: Order of evidence
presentation, ability to ruminate, and valence of the initial belief (innocence or guilt). College students (n = 382) were presented
with DNA evidence (incriminating or exonerating) and an ambiguous alibi in one of two orders (or just the alibi), and then evaluated
how strongly the alibi incriminated the suspect and the suspect’s likelihood of guilt. Results indicated that alibi evaluation
exhibited context effects when (i) initial beliefs were of guilt (but not of innocence) and when (ii) evaluating subsequent evidence
(but not when retroactively evaluating prior evidence). Rumination failed to moderate any effects. The integration of evidence
exhibited recency effects: DNA had a greater impact on participants’ beliefs in the suspect’s guilt when presented last rather than
first.